Wealth is often used to measure a person’s success. Do you agree that wealth is an accurate measurement of an individual’s success? What other factors should also be considered when measuring how successful a person is?
What it means to be successful often changes based on a variety of factors. I do not believe that wealth always means a person is successful. Personally, I think a person can be termed a success if they have enough money to pay for their current and future needs, feel content, and are respected by the people who know them.
It is not necessarily true that those who are wealthy should be considered successful. For example, there are many cases of people simply inheriting their wealth or winning lottery money. Instead, it is almost universally accepted that those who work to support themselves, their families, and the community are people who deserve respect and have achieved something important. They usually have some degree of independence and will often not be a burden to others.
An alternative measure of success is the average level of happiness and contentment a person has. Many spiritual and philosophical leaders agree that the purpose of life is to be happy, and if an individual gains fame and fortune but is miserable, then that person deserves pity. Clearly, being wealthy and depressed or under great stress does not sound as appealing as having less money but being happy with what one has. Secondly, successful people are those who the other members of their community admire. For instance, if someone achieves great power and wealth, but brings shame to his family, community, or nation, it is difficult to label them a true success.
In conclusion, wealth alone does not indicate success, and other factors such as happiness levels and the degree to which one is respected by society need to be considered. If individuals were to consider these factors, there might be a strong possibility of a general increase in happiness levels across nations.
297 words
An individual is often assessed by his income and lifestyle status in society. The greater the bank account balance, the higher the ranking among people in the same community. This is indeed a bitter truth in general and unfortunately, often the success of a person is determined by his wealth. However, In my opinion, there are many parameters and one can not label someone as successful just because of his high earnings. In this essay, I will discuss and suggest my point of view and other essential factors to support the same.
Firstly, regarding wealth as the most important measure of success. It is indeed a crucial factor in today's world, as the purchasing power of a person and how much one can spend, determine his or her status in society. For instance, someone with a beautiful home and expensive belongings in a safe and well-connected place and with vehicles to drive will be considered more victorious in life than who is struggling to pay money for daily chores.
However, having said so, there is another side to the story too. The measure of success in life has different meanings for different individuals. Fulfilment of an individual dream and happiness brought in life, whether that includes money or not, I believe is the best measure to determine progress. Furthermore, respect in society and a good healthy life are other important determinants. For example, if a rich person is fraudulent and earns money but also has a bad reputation or has a lifelong illness, will surely be not measured as successful despite having large bank balances.
To sum up, it is certainly true that often prosperity is confused with success as we see people from that angle. Nevertheless, there are other considerably more important measures than money to count a person as a triumphant one.
304 words
Wealth is often seen as an accurate indicator of a person's success and I strongly disagree with this idea. There are many other aspects that should be considered when evaluating someone's success such as happiness, academic qualifications, and contributions to society.
From one perspective, evaluating individual's success based solely on their wealth is completely wrong. Firstly, if a person inherits a large amount of money from their parents, they become rich, but it is not certain make them become successful individuals. The inherited money should be the great foundation, but if they do not use it wisely, they may end up bankrupt. Secondly, some people can become rich by winning the lottery so they should not be considered successful.
Success should be measured not only by financial status but also by other significant factors. To begin, the measurement of success have to based on happiness and relationships. A person who is loved and respected by others is successful and having good friends and loving family is a crucial indicator success. In addition, contributions to society are important when measuring success. Individuals who volunteer, help others, contribute to charity and change the communities in positive ways demonstrate success through their impact. Furthermore, academic qualifications probably should not be overlooked to evaluating a person's success. People who have worked hard to obtain certifications show their dedication and intelligence, which are crucial keys of success.
In sum, it seems obvious to me that there are many aspects to evaluate person's success, and measuring the successful of person based solely on their wealth is not an accurate way. It should include being happy, having good relationships, having academic qualifications and contributing to society. Success is likely a complex concept of which wealth is just a part.
Number of words entered: 291 words TA:8 CC:8 LR:7 GR:7 OVL: 7.5